MANILA, Philippines - HaryanaBlog -- CAPHRA has warned that efforts by Singapore and the Philippines to promote a regional vape ban through ASEAN would ignore growing evidence on tobacco harm reduction and risk locking the region into failed prohibitionist policy.

The warning follows reports that the health ministers of Singapore and the Philippines agreed during a bilateral meeting at the World Health Assembly to explore joint advocacy for a vape ban among ASEAN member states.

CAPHRA Executive Coordinator Nancy Loucas said ASEAN governments should not be pushed into a ban-first approach that disregards relative risk and real-world evidence.

"ASEAN should not ban first and examine the evidence later. You do not reduce smoking by removing lower-risk alternatives while cigarettes remain widely available."

The proposal is particularly troubling because it comes as support grows internationally for more pragmatic tobacco control strategies that distinguish combustible tobacco from lower-risk smoke-free alternatives. Former WHO leaders and senior global health figures have recently argued that tobacco harm reduction should be part of public health policy, especially where smoking-related disease remains high.

More on Haryana Blog

• Kolbus Introduces the Next Step in Casemaking Efficiency
• Florida Law Advisers, P.A. Named Best Divorce Firm of 2026 by Expert Law Attorneys
• Sounds of LA County: 27 Parks.108 Concerts. One County
• Only One Flight Stands Between Los Angeles Youth Leaders and a Life-Saving Mission in South Africa
• Stigma Across Borders: Concerns Grow Over Discrimination Against Shincheonji Members Abroad

"The call for evidence-based harm reduction is not coming only from consumers," Loucas said. "Respected former global health leaders are also warning that ideology should not override science when lives are at stake."

CAPHRA said Singapore is entitled to maintain its own domestic policy but should not seek to turn that position into a regional standard for all ASEAN countries. The Philippines, where vapour products are legal, should be especially careful about backing a regional prohibition that would override national legislative realities and ignore the experience of Filipino consumers who have already switched away from smoking.

Clarisse Virgino of CAPHRA Philippines said regional policymaking must not become a shortcut for anti-harm-reduction agendas.

"The Philippines should not help build a regional ban that ignores Filipino consumers who have already moved away from cigarettes," Virgino said. "ASEAN governments must make policy based on evidence, health outcomes, and their own national realities, not political signalling dressed up as consensus."

More on Haryana Blog

• World Cup Crowds Are a Stress Test for America's Restrooms
• Postmortem Pathology Expands Access to Private Autopsy Services in Las Vegas
• How Sacramento Families Are Using Private Autopsies to Protect Inheritances, Resolve Insurance Claims, and Find Closure
• Los Angeles' Best Food: Food Journal Magazine Examines the Trends Shaping the City's Dining Scene
• Landmark Construction Expands Glass, Glazing, and Commercial Remodeling Services Across Los Angeles County and Surrounding Areas

CAPHRA said it supports strong youth protections, strict product standards, enforcement against illegal sales, and penalties for bad actors, but stressed that prohibition is not the same as effective regulation. Broad bans do not eliminate demand; they shift it into informal and illicit markets, reduce product oversight, and make it harder for adult smokers to access lower-risk alternatives.

"Bans protect the cigarette trade more than they protect public health," Loucas said. "If governments remove regulated alternatives while combustible tobacco remains entrenched, many smokers will simply stay with the products that do the most harm."

CAPHRA is calling on ASEAN governments to reject any rushed regional vape ban and instead pursue risk-proportionate regulation that addresses local issues with local solutions.

https://www.caphraorg.net